{"id":453,"date":"2019-03-14T20:43:02","date_gmt":"2019-03-15T03:43:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/joesays.ca\/?p=453"},"modified":"2019-04-20T20:07:35","modified_gmt":"2019-04-21T03:07:35","slug":"seeing-is-deceiving","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/joesays.ca\/?p=453","title":{"rendered":"seeing is deceiving"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A couple of years ago in the run up to the 2016 US election, I happened to stumble upon Newt Gingrich being interviewed on some US cable news program.\u00a0 He was stumping for Trump and the interviewer was quizzing him about one of the innumerable falsehoods the Candidate was peddling on the campaign trail.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt simply isn\u2019t true,\u201d the newsman said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat doesn\u2019t matter,\u201d replied Gingrich smugly, \u201cWhat matters is people <em>believe<\/em> it\u2019s true.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This was early in the campaign, before fake news became the mantra of Trump\u2019s MAGA movement, but as the months wore on and events south of the border became increasingly surreal and detached from reality, Gingrich\u2019s comment came back to me again and again, more troubling with every visitation.<\/p>\n<p>Troubling, because it was an affront to everything I hold to be true. Against all odds, against all evidence, against all fact: people will believe what they want to believe.<\/p>\n<p>(Considered from a meta-viewpoint, it occurred to me that this is perhaps the mystery that underpins all religious faith: when there is absolutely no empirical proof of something, yet people believe it anyway.\u00a0 What did I read recently? When one hundred people believe a falsehood, it\u2019s fake news. When one billion believe, it\u2019s a religion. Discuss.)<\/p>\n<p>Bottom line is that we are living in a society that doesn\u2019t know what to believe.\u00a0 But if you thought things were bad now, they\u2019re going to get worse.\u00a0 Check this out.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Jennifer Lawrence-Buscemi on her favorite housewives [Deepfake]\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/r1jng79a5xc?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Let me try to parse this.\u00a0 This is video of Jennifer Lawrence, an actress, answering press questions following a recent awards ceremony. The thing is, her face has been replaced with that of Steve Buscemi, also an actor (and an excellent one) but who is completely irrelevant to the topic at hand.<\/p>\n<p>How was this done?\u00a0 Here is my rather old school explanation.<\/p>\n<p>We have video of Jennifer Lawrence delivering the speech.<\/p>\n<p>We have video of Steve Buscemi speaking.<\/p>\n<p>Computer programs analyse these images and create 3D models of both faces, then, using AI, recreate the motions and expressions of JL\u2019s face model using the data of the SB face model, then seamlessly composite it back onto the original footage.<\/p>\n<p>There are several layers to this process that are frightening to me.<\/p>\n<p><em>That it can be done at all.<\/em>\u00a0 This is a reality we all must accept. It is here, it is happening.<\/p>\n<p><em>That it can be done so quickly and so easily.\u00a0 <\/em>Ditto. Not so long ago these capabilities were limited to a few highly skilled and exotically equipped visual effects houses; now they are available to almost anyone, anywhere.<\/p>\n<p><em>What it means for the future of media.<\/em>\u00a0 This is the big one.\u00a0 In the midst of our fake news addled \/ conspiracy theory ridden \/ insanely partisan media environment, deep-fakes add yet another layer of artifice to the increasingly shaky notion of Truth.\u00a0 Heretofore, we could dismiss text based news stories as fabrications, we could disparage still images as photoshopped fakes.\u00a0 But video footage enjoyed a certain bullet-proof veracity.\u00a0 We could believe it.<\/p>\n<p>Until now.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A couple of years ago in the run up to the 2016 US election, I happened to stumble upon Newt Gingrich being interviewed on some US cable news program.\u00a0 He was stumping for Trump and the interviewer was quizzing him about one of the innumerable falsehoods the Candidate was peddling on the campaign trail. \u201cIt&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-453","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-facts","category-rants"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/joesays.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/453","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/joesays.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/joesays.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/joesays.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/joesays.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=453"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/joesays.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/453\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":460,"href":"https:\/\/joesays.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/453\/revisions\/460"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/joesays.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=453"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/joesays.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=453"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/joesays.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=453"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}